Public vs. Private
July 15, 2006 11:45 AM
UPDATE: The New York Times article about the report mentions our previous blog post. Has the NCLBlog officially "arrived" now that it has appeared in the "paper of record?"
The U.S. Department of Education finally has released a comparison of student achievement in public and private schools.
The study, which uses 4th and 8th grade NAEP scores for reading and math, seeks to account for student background characteristics, thus eliminating the wealth advantage of private school students and providing an apples-to-apples comparison. We wrote before that (1) ED seemed to be reluctant or slow to release the data, (2) ED seemed likely to dump it on a news-killing Friday, and (3) the results likely would echo a similar study, which showed public school students outperforming private school students.
Here’s the scorecard for our predictions:
(1) Three-year-old data? Yes, ED was slow to release it. What's more, charter school data collected at the same time still hasn't been released. Anyone think it will come out next month? There's four Fridays to choose from.
(2) We guessed Friday, June 30 -- missed by two weeks, but we got the day of the week right.
(3) Half-right. The 4th-grade math results show public students outperforming private school students, but in 8th-grade reading private school students outperform public school students. (The two other public-private comparisons were not statistically significant.)
The study is good news for public schools, whose students do as well as private schools' when background factors are taken into account. And it's bad news for those who want to use tax dollars to send more and more kids to private schools via tuition tax credits and vouchers. Money would be better spent on proven reforms in the public schools attended by 90% of children.



Comments
I suppose the fact that public and private schools had fairly similar results could be seen as bad news for voucher and school choice supporters. But I've also seen arguments from anti-choice types that private/charter schools skim the cream from the top and therefore they shouldn't be competitors for public funds. Perhaps the results show that private schools actually serve similar populations of students as the public schools. This would remove the idea that vouchers and other follow-the-child money schemes are inherently unfair to children left behind in public schools which are required to educate all children.
Posted by: SLM | July 19, 2006 12:15 PM
SLM,
You wrote:
The study showed exactly the opposite. Private school students' "wealth advantage" was evident. It disappeared only when the researchers factored in students' backgrounds, thus allowing apples-to-apples comparisons.
Posted by: John at AFT | July 19, 2006 01:37 PM
Private always rules .
Posted by: Anonymous | July 28, 2006 03:58 PM