« Speed Read | Main | Video: Sherman Dorn vs. a 7'9" Basketball Player »

"Cutting Through Right-Wing Spin on Public Education"

August 7, 2006 11:00 AM

After the U.S. Department of Education released a long-delayed study showing public school students doing as well as or better than private school students, voucher advocate Paul Peterson responded in an entirely predictable way, arguing that the report's methodology was seriously flawed.  But Peterson's one-note tune is beginning to sound a little shrill.

In an essay titled "Cutting Through Right-Wing Spin on Public Education," Kevin Franck of People for the American Way puts Paul Peterson's latest distortions in context:

Every school day in America, thousands of teachers work hard to help students grow into thoughtful, responsible citizens. The recent NCES study shows that their hard work is paying off. Tragically there are public schools that struggle, and those schools need honest, effective, and research-proven reform. We need to continue the debate about school reform, but we must remain committed to honesty and to our public schools. But quasi-academic proponents of privatization, like Paul Peterson, are committed to neither.  (Via Education News.org)

If Peterson were ever to "rework" someone else's study and find that it is unfairly critical of public schools -- surely, that must happen sometimes -- then he might have some credibility.  But when every Peterson study comes out the same way and concludes that everybody else's research has a pro-public school bias, it's hard to take Peterson seriously. 

And, apparently, few journalists do.  His response made only a tiny ripple in the media.

Comments

Unfortunately, Franck doesn't get into the heart of Peterson's claims.

Well put. I've been following Paul Peterson's work for 10 years. Simply put, he has never met a pro-public school study that he liked, and he has never met a pro-voucher study that he disliked. Unfortunately, Harvard University does a great disservice to the public debate over vouchers by allowing Peterson to publish under the Harvard imprimatur, which gives Peterson the cover of being an "objective researcher." But it appears that the media are catching on to these games. Increasingly, Peterson is characterized (correctly) in the press as a "long-time voucher advocate," and this time around, his agenda-driven "study" refuting the Department's paper was all but ignored by the mainstream press. It's encouraging to see the media becoming more skeptical of ideologues who pose as researchers. We need more of that!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Categories

Accountability

AFT's Convention

Assessments

Charter

DC Schools

Early Childhood

Ed Tech

General

Higher Ed

Instruction

Labor

Legislation

Media

New Orleans

Paraprofessionals and School-Related Personnel

Privatization

School choice

School finance

School Improvement

Special Ed

Staff Quality

Standards

Teachers' Voices

Vouchers

Archives

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 0000

Recent Posts

There's a Flag (or Several) on the Play

Your SES profits, sir

Edwizdom: "How long can you look at a test score?"

Clarification

What Would Chuckbutt Do?

The NCLBlog

Co-Editor: John
Co-Editor: Michele

Have a tip about NCLB? Contact our tipline at tips@letsgetitright.org.

For questions or general information, email us at info@letsgetitright.org.

Disclaimer: The NCLB Blog was established by the AFT as a forum where public education advocates, policymakers and others can exchange information and express their opinions on NCLB and related issues. The views expressed here are not the official views of the AFT or any of its affiliates. All claims otherwise would violate the spirit and purpose of the blog. © American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO. All rights reserved. Photographs and illustrations cannot be used without permission of the AFT.


Home About AFT Blog Sign Our Petition Contact Us Send to a Friend Printer-friendly Page

The NCLB Blog was established by the AFT as a forum where public education advocates, policymakers and others can exchange information and express their opinions on NCLB and related issues. The views expressed here are not the official views of the AFT or any of its affiliates. All claims otherwise would violate the spirit and purpose of the blog. © American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO. All rights reserved. Photographs and illustrations cannot be used without permission of the AFT.