« Unions, NCLB, Liberals, Oh My | Main | Ed Sector's "But" Fetish »

Class Size Fraud?

April 13, 2007 05:37 PM

In this decade-old program, this is the first I’ve heard of any CA district getting in trouble for falsifying class size documents in order to get state class size money. I will say that it happened all of the time, both in the school where I taught and in colleagues’ schools.

Here’s how: school starts in September and teachers get their class rosters with 19 or 20 students. In the first couple of weeks of school, six or seven of those students don’t show up, but seven or eight others do.  Students get shifted between classrooms to even out the class sizes.  Sometimes teachers have to shift grades and sometimes additional teachers—usually substitutes—are hired.  If a school is lucky, it has an extra classroom or space for a portable and a class of twenty students is cobbled together.

Santa Ana is a city with high poverty and high mobility, and is a first stop for many immigrants.  In such school systems, students enter and leave school all of the time. Sometimes they return; sometimes they don’t. When class sizes tip over 20 students, a principal has to decide whether and how long to wait before hiring some adult to teach a newly formed class.

What’s a teacher to do? We could have complained, but it did seem like the schools were trying their best to keep class sizes under 20.  Plus, it was pretty obvious that the school needed money for everything—textbooks, a social worker, bilingual paraprofessionals, soap for the bathrooms, etc.

The benefits of small class sizes, especially for students in poverty, are indisputable. But, there is not a good way to manage a class size reduction program in a school or district with exactly the students most likely to benefit from small class sizes—one with very high mobility rates, overcrowded schools, and an inability to attract enough certified teachers.  There is also the issue of whether it a good idea to take a couple of students out of a classroom with a certified teacher and place them in a room presided over by a substitute so that the schools gets desperately needed funds.

Yes, deliberately falsifying documents is wrong, but, based on the reports so far, I believe that the district was doing its best to provide some semblance of a sound and stable education while securing needed funds.

Comments

"The benefits of small class sizes, especially for students in poverty, are indisputable."

I don't see how you can make that statement, given that not one single study has ever shown any beneficial effect of class size on education.

And instead of lying to steal public funds, how about not mismanaging the funds you already get?

Well, there's this seminal study out of Tennessee: http://www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/vol5no2ART8.pdf.

This is from the abstract: "After four years, it was clear that smaller classes did produce substantial improvement in early learning and cognitive studies and that the effect of small class size on the achievement of minority children was initially about double that observed for majority children?Observations made as a part of this phase confirmed that the children who were originally enrolled in smaller classes continued to perform better than their grade-mates (whose school experience had begun in larger classes) when they were returned to regular-sized classes in later grades."

Thanks for the comment, Right Wing Prof!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Categories

Accountability

AFT's Convention

Assessments

Charter

DC Schools

Early Childhood

Ed Tech

General

Higher Ed

Instruction

Labor

Legislation

Media

New Orleans

Paraprofessionals and School-Related Personnel

Privatization

School choice

School finance

School Improvement

Special Ed

Staff Quality

Standards

Teachers' Voices

Vouchers

Archives

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 0000

Recent Posts

There's a Flag (or Several) on the Play

Your SES profits, sir

Edwizdom: "How long can you look at a test score?"

Clarification

What Would Chuckbutt Do?

The NCLBlog

Co-Editor: John
Co-Editor: Michele

Have a tip about NCLB? Contact our tipline at tips@letsgetitright.org.

For questions or general information, email us at info@letsgetitright.org.

Disclaimer: The NCLB Blog was established by the AFT as a forum where public education advocates, policymakers and others can exchange information and express their opinions on NCLB and related issues. The views expressed here are not the official views of the AFT or any of its affiliates. All claims otherwise would violate the spirit and purpose of the blog. © American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO. All rights reserved. Photographs and illustrations cannot be used without permission of the AFT.


Home About AFT Blog Sign Our Petition Contact Us Send to a Friend Printer-friendly Page

The NCLB Blog was established by the AFT as a forum where public education advocates, policymakers and others can exchange information and express their opinions on NCLB and related issues. The views expressed here are not the official views of the AFT or any of its affiliates. All claims otherwise would violate the spirit and purpose of the blog. © American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO. All rights reserved. Photographs and illustrations cannot be used without permission of the AFT.