A Very Weakly Standard Argument for Vouchers
November 8, 2007 10:13 AM
What's missing from this unconvincing piece by Michael Tobman arguing that both Democrats and Republicans would be wise to support school vouchers? Well, for starters, any pretext of an argument that school vouchers are good for children.
The most offensive part may be this:
Further, supporting education policies that benefit families who send their children to Yeshivas would provide candidates with something worthwhile and productive to speak about in committed Jewish communities other than the usual and predictable comments on Israel and the Middle East.
And with Utahns' overwhelming vote yesterday against vouchers, Tobman's argument that vouchers are a political winner for anyone is laughable.
Tobman has broken new ground with this piece: It is as cynical and shallow as education commentary can get and still be publishable. Even by the Weekly Standards' standards.



Comments
"Michael Tobman, a former senior aide to Senator Charles Schumer of New York, is a lobbyist and communications consultant who lives in Brooklyn, New York."
I believe that would that be the same Michael Tobman formerly of the staff of Chuck Schumer who is/was exec director of the New York tax credit group TEACH NYS.
Posted by: Ed at AFT | November 8, 2007 11:43 PM
Any talk of vouchers is bad for public schools.
Posted by: jcapuano | November 13, 2007 09:34 PM