The Standards Movement is Back
April 29, 2008 04:35 PM

Today, the AFT released Sizing Up State Standards 2008*, which finds some states making meaningful progress in developing grade-by-grade content standards for English, math, science and social studies.
Virginia scored 100%, and 15 others were above 75% -- not bad since we used more rigorous criteria this year.
Some states are still lagging, though (including a half-dozen or so with no standards meeting the AFT's criteria). So, we're recommending these states cheat off their neighbors. That is, we're suggesting they adopt/adapt strong standards from other states or, better still, get together with nearby states to create common standards, curricula and assessments. Hmmm...that last recommendations sounds familiar.
*Guess I should retract an old post, The Top 10 Signs the Standards Movement Might Be Dead, in which I suggested that if you played an Al Shanker podcast backwards, you could hear him say, "Standards, schmandards."



Comments
I think you got it wrong on Virginia -- any state that says students have to memorize four specific historical figures from the twentieth century and appears to pick them primarily to balance the racist politicians (Harry Flood Byrd) with Arthur Ashe and Douglas Wilder gets a zero-thought, micromanagement assessment in my book.
Posted by: Sherman Dorn | April 29, 2008 04:38 PM
Yes, the quality of the content matters. The issue of historical content and whether it is appropriate is an important discussion for every state.
Unfortunately, our analysis showed us that only two states (Massachusetts and Virginia) can have such a discussion because only two states developed standards for all grades and courses that specify the events, the people, and the places that all students in their state should be learning.
Teachers, students, and parents have a right to know what is expected of students, especially if that state will be holding schools, staff, or students accountable for their performance in those subject areas.
Posted by: Heidi at AFT | May 1, 2008 01:49 PM